Categories
Rugby

It’s Hard to Make Fair Comparisons Given the Gulf in World Rankings Between Namibia and France

The All Blacks did not run with the ball much, and it hurt them in the game. France kicked better and controlled the field position. Because the All Blacks didn’t run, there was less time for active play, only 27 minutes in total.

They missed a crucial part of their strategy. They usually want to tire out the opponents by playing a fast game, but they couldn’t do that in this match.

They prefer when the game becomes less organized because they are excellent at taking advantage of open spaces and playing instinctively, making them the best team in the world.

It’s Hard to Make Fair Comparisons Given the Gulf in World Rankings Between Namibia and France
All Blacks Rugby team

This is New Zealand’s happy place – a broken game against a tired defense. Give them this scenario. They are deadly because their players are trained to run for 80 minutes, and even the big guys know how to end two-on-one battles.

Against France, where there was little aerobics, there was no fatigue in the final quarter, and when the All Blacks tried to spread the ball wide, the French defenders were able to get where they needed to be, and there was a penalty.

It is debatable whether the French defenders would have been able to commit so many turnovers had the ball been in play for more than 40 minutes, as they did when the All Blacks tormented the Wallabies in Melbourne earlier this year. Yes, but it’s a big unknown.

Also Read: The All Blacks Have Shared an Update about the Team’s Condition, Mentioning that they Have a Strong Squad and Only a Few Players are Returning from Injuries.

The All Blacks Match with Namibia Was Rated Higher than France, But it is Hard to Compare Due to the Teams’ Rankings.

The All Blacks prefer the game to last longer because it suits their style of play. In their last match with France, Dane Coles mentioned that the time the ball was in play was only 27 minutes, which to them was not good enough.

The All Blacks Match with Namibia Was Rated Higher than France, But it is Hard to Compare Due to the Teams' Rankings
The All Blacks Match with Namibia (Credits: Planet Rugby)

“That’s something we’ve got to be better at. If we get time to play, we have to make it count, and we didn’t do that.

“They kicked the ball a lot, and we didn’t respond well. We need to improve and work harder to figure out when to run, kick, or do other things in the game.”

Coles agreed with the coaches that there was too much kicking in the Paris game. They changed that in the next game against Namibia.

It is hard to make a fair comparison given the gap between Namibia and France in the world rankings, but the All Blacks have shown a better indication of how they really want to play at this World Cup than the former.

There is. They were confident in running continuously from deep, keeping the ball alive across multiple phases, and creating space through the speed of their ball carriers and the timing of their passes.

Categories
Rugby

The All Blacks Need to Play More Open and Exciting Rugby, Breaking from their Usual Style

In the first game of the World Cup, the All Blacks got in trouble because they kept losing the ball and giving away penalties when their player with the ball was all alone, and the other team took it away from them.

The French team showed a great defensive plan and won because their strong players knew how to take the ball away from the All Blacks by getting in the right positions.

The All Blacks Need to Play More Open and Exciting Rugby, Breaking from their Usual Style
Planet Rugby (Credits: Planet Rugby)

The All Blacks learned that they must be cautious when using the entire field during the tournament. Les Bleus made it seem easy at the end, like they had a smart plan to upset and beat the All Blacks. In the first half, France kicked the ball away a lot. They did not seem to want it, and Antoine Dupont kicked it far, letting the All Blacks decide what to do with it.

And what the All Blacks wanted to do was kick it back. And that’s what they did. Time and time again, the first 40 minutes were strangely subdued, with Beauden Barrett and Richie Mo’unga seemingly determined not to fight back under any circumstances.

In the second half, France successfully forced the All Blacks into several mistakes, putting pressure on the scoreboard and forcing New Zealand to play catch-up rugby.

When the New Zealanders go into this mode and try to play wider, they are an easy target for turnovers for the French, with All Blacks manager Ian Foster saying, “They’re isolated against the French…They don’t give the ball away.” He’s very good at attacking,” he lamented.

The solution for the All Blacks appears to be to abandon their preferred ball-in-hand game and, like the other major teams at this World Cup, be conservative and keep kicking the ball.

This clearly worked for France, Ireland, South Africa, and England, with stats from the first two rounds of the tournament showing they averaged 56 shots per game, the most since the 1996 World Cup.

England’s entire game plan was based on putting the ball away, and attacking coach Richard Wrigglesworth said after their 34–12 win over Japan that they were “not happy with our attacking position.”

Also Read: Ireland’s Perspective on South Africa’s So-called ‘Bomb Squad

It is Never in New Zealand’s DNA to Spend 80 Minutes Kicking The Ball Away

“But it has nothing to do with the kicking game, and it’s not separate from it. It’s all part of the same fabric. You want to shoot the ball brilliantly, so either you take it back brilliantly, or you take the shot and score.” Either you do it.

“It’s definitely better to fight for position than lose the ball. What we’ve seen so far in this World Cup is that the most successful teams have had very skilled and efficient kicking games. We are working to make sure we are in the best position possible. ”

It is Never in New Zealand’s DNA to Spend 80 Minutes Kicking the Ball Away
NZL 71-3 NAM (Credits: Rugby World Cup)

But spending 80 minutes kicking the ball is not in New Zealand’s DNA. They want effective kicking strategies and, despite appearances, have always been one of the most prolific kicking teams in world football.

But they will never play like England. There’s always a balance in their game because they have too many natural ball runners and talented athletes on their team and don’t want to put the ball in their hands and run it defensively.

Therefore, the key for New Zealand to be more effective at this World Cup is not to stick to the same kick-heavy strategy as other teams but rather to double down on their running game and become one of the few teams in this World Cup. Anyone who does this is happier playing with the ball than without it.

In practice, this means you have to develop a counter-attack strategy and be ready to give it back when the ball is handed to you.